APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1: TAXONOMY
Services supplied via institution licences and searched at no additional cost to user or library service. Resources, usually formal databases, are easily accessed from any work station using either a common (institution-wide) password/userID or recognising institutional IP addresses.
Excludes: Resources held on the local network
Examples: BIDS, OCLC FirstSearch, MIMAS, EDINA
Access to databases made available through single host or vendor systems (other than JISC/CHEST services) which typically allow access to 100+ databases. Some of these databases may be available independently (possibly from their information providers/publishers) over WWW and these would excluded here and coded as Online database via Web (below). In most cases charges would be dependent on use.
Includes: Distributed CD-ROM servers such as SilverPlatter's Electronic Reference Library databases.
Excludes: Databases accessed directly (i.e. NOT through a vendor such as DIALOG) via the Web Examples:
• Hosts/vendors such as: DIALOG; DataStar; DIMDI, OVID Online
• Databases accessed could include ISI databases, INSPEC, Compendex, MEDLINE, etc
Access to databases made available directly and independently (possibly from their information providers/publishers) over WWW. In most cases charges would be dependent on use.
Excludes: Databases used through a Web-based vendor site.
Examples:
• Services such as: GratefulMED, PubMed, PubScience
• Databases accessed could include ISI databases, MEDLINE, etc
Services providing access to unprocessed data and possibly software (e.g. census or survey data or scientific datasets) for research and training. Often JISC/CHEST mediated.
Examples: The Data Archive (University of Essex), RCADE (The Resource Centre for Access to Data on Europe), NDAD (UK National Digital Archive of Datasets at ULCC), UKBORDERS, Genome databank
Single collections or repositories of full-text materials – monographs, poetry collections, collections of letters, etc (often out-of-copyright material) other than journals. May be subdivided by subject or date of publication, etc.
Excludes: Journal, magazine or periodical collections (see below)
Examples: Oxford Text Archive, Project Gutenberg, University of Virginia Electronic Text Centre, netLibrary
Hubs and existing subject gateways (not limited to eLib initiatives): Web sites that exist solely to guide users to a selection of quality controlled resources in a limited subject area such as medicine or engineering. Resources included are usually abstracted and may be rated. Sites that do not meet their specific, defined criteria are not included.
Includes: ‘Jump stations’, virtual libraries, significant resource collections, published bookmark collections
Excludes: Search engine subject trees or own HEI developed gateways; own bookmarks Examples: EEVL, OMNI/BIOME, SOSIG, BUBL, NISS, etc
The electronic version of the catalogue (Online Public Access Catalogue) for any part or branch of own institution's library accessed via WWW or Telnet. Use for library administration purposes should be separated out. Main library, subject/faculty/departmental libraries, libraries on other sites but not libraries in other institutions used cooperatively. In most cases there will be a single OPAC across the whole institution.
Excludes: Other institutions' and combined OPACs
Examples: University of Wales, Aberystwyth combined OPAC for both Thomas Parry and Hugh Owen Libraries
The electronic version of the catalogue (Online Public Access Catalogue) for any library that is not a part of own institution, accessed via the WWW or Telnet.
Includes: Clumps and major national catalogues
Examples: Individual HEI OPACs; COPAC; BL catalogue
Any own institution-mounted resources accessed over the LAN other than those more specifically mentioned elsewhere in the taxonomy (e.g. OPACs, locally mounted CD-ROMs).
Includes: Material hosted by HEI such as conference proceedings
Excludes: Use of software, OPACs, locally mounted e- resources
Examples: Registry documents, timetables, staff profiles, contact details, course outlines, course materials.
Any use of remote organisational Web sites other than publishers or specific commercial/banking sites which are included elsewhere.
Includes: Sites visited for information
Excludes: Publisher sites, shopping, recreational
Examples: Other universities, BBC, News sites
Services providing summaries of the contents of journals, etc electronically – possibly within a subject domain. Current information (e.g. contents pages, tables of contents, news items or Web addresses). While these may be sent directly to subscribers via e-mail, this survey is for information seeking activities and thus includes only use of archives mounted on the Web.
Excludes: Newsletters which should be included as electronic journals; material already held by interviewee from received subscription emails.
Examples: BUBL's Journal Update lists (lis-bubl-e2), NewsAgent, Current Cites
Document delivery services providing articles in an electronic format.
Excludes: BL inside (delivered by fax)
Examples: SWETScan, Blackwells electronic journal navigator
The Internet used for interpersonal communication, both one-to-one and one-to-many. This would include e-mail – both professional and personal – as well as messages retrieved from lists, and information retrieval browsing through/searching list archives, Bulletin Boards or USENET. This could mean e-mail via a conventional client such as Eudora or via a browser to services such as Hotmail. USENET newsgroup are often also accessed via a browser, as are BBs.
Excludes: As with current awareness services, material already held by interviewee received from list subscriptions is excluded as this survey is for information seeking activities and thus includes only e-mails received in response to an information request (personal or to a list) and searching of archives, etc mounted on the Web.
Examples: E-mail discussion lists; Mailbase archives; USENET news; BBs
Single point of access to multiple electronic journals (these may be parallel published (print and paper) or electronic only). May be all from one publisher (e.g. MCB University Press) or may be similar in nature to a conventional library supplier such as SWETS or EBSCO. The emphasis would be on a single licence offering access to many (possibly not all available from the source) journals.
Excludes: Publishers who hold only a few journals (e.g. Aslib) – count as single e-journals rather than collections in this sense.
Examples: JSTOR, Ingenta, NESLI
Single electronic journals mounted by both formal and informal publishers. These could be in parallel with a print version or solely electronic. They may also offer the chance of reader feedback. One site may offer more than one journal (e.g. Aslib) but these are essentially single publications rather than large collections and should be included.
Examples: Program; Ariadne; Journal of Information, Law and Technology (JILT); Information Research; FreePint
Web sites from specific publishers (such as OUP, Routledge or Penguin) which may contain catalogues, excerpts, single chapters, reviews, added-value resources, contents pages or even complete texts. If this is a single-publisher site offering access to multiple journals, categorise at electronic journal collections.
Includes: All publishers of monographs and e-monographs. Only includes journal publishers if offering only catalogues or value-added materials (rather than the actual journals classed elsewhere).
Excludes: Publisher site offering access to single or multiple journals.
Examples: OUP, Routledge, Penguin
Collections of papers/materials not yet formally published but deposited by authors in the interests of rapid dissemination. Normally mounted on academic/research sites.
Includes: Authors' own archives
Excludes: Commercial publisher collections
Examples: Los Alamos Eprint Archive in Physics (LANL)
Both non-networked electronic resources – possibly issued for use on PCs within library – and resources held on the institution's network for use solely within the institution or by the institution's staff and students.
Includes: CD-ROMs directly mounted on the LAN; cached onto hard disks and available via the LAN or issued over the desk for use on individual PCs. It would be necessary to distinguish all three – or, at least, networked from issued.
Excludes: Locally generated accommodation list or bus timetable held on LAN which should be classed at HEI Web sites.
Examples: MEDLINE, OED, The Times
Any resource enabling users to locate new resources on the Internet – either by searching against input terms or by hierarchical subject trees.
Includes: Meta search engines
Excludes: Subject gateways, etc mentioned elsewhere; Web sites with internal search engines. Examples: AltaVista; Yahoo!; Google; Northern Light; Lycos
Systems offered by library supply companies (e.g. Blackwells or SWETS) to help library staff in the selection and acquisition of (mostly paper-based) books and journals. This option would only be applicable to library staff in the survey.
Examples: Blackwells' Collection Manager
Any resource accessed via the WWW not covered above. In addition to 'professional' resources, this could include sites allowing shopping (not just books!), electronic banking and other recreational use. "Others" category.
Examples: Dictionaries, term banks, encyclopaedia, thesauri, telephone directories, rail timetables, FAQs, shopping sites, electronic banking, leisure/recreational sites.


APPENDIX 3: Exception Plan
1 DESCRIPTION
1.1 Scope
This plan has been produced to test out the main elements of a proposed methodology for the second cycle. The aim of the methodology is a) to increase awareness of the JISC project work among academic staff and b) to increase student recruitment for interviews and email questionnaires. Student recruitment has been a major difficulty (see interim JUSTIEIS report for details) – despite measures already taken.
1.2 Approach
|
Week number /dates |
Details of task |
|
Week 1: April 3 – April 7 |
Make initial contacts with sites, finalise selected departments, and prepare lists of staff to contact |
|
Week 2: 1 May – 5 May |
Contact selected academic staff at sites, exchange documentation, arrange meetings |
|
Week 3: 8 May – 12 May |
Visits to sites to meet academic staff |
|
Week 4: 15 May – 19 May |
Site visits / interviews/ arrange email surveys |
|
Week 5: 22 May – 26 May |
Site visits / interviews / arrange email surveys |
|
Week 6: 29 May – 2 June |
Complete interviews/ email surveys |
|
Week 7: 5 June – 9 June |
Collate data, analysis |
|
Week 8: 12 June – 16 June |
Complete report |
2 ASSUMPTIONS
The plan assumes that one extra member of research staff can be recruited for 2 months. The plan assumes that:
3 EXTERNAL DEPENDENCIES
The plan assumes that anticipated difficulties of the academic year activities (e.g. exams) can be accommodated within the planned schedule of tasks.
4 COSTS
|
Site visits (9 days @ £72 per day, over 3 weeks |
£648.00 |
|
Travel (car hire @ 170 for 3 days, each of 3 weeks) + petrol |
£640.00 |
|
Professional staff for 2 months |
£5000.00 |
|
Consumables (+ excess transferred from existing project) |
£112.00 |
|
TOTAL |
£6500.00 |
CJU
exception.doc 30 March 2000
Appendix 4: JUSTEIS SAMPLE: Departments
Alphabetical list of HEIs in sample, with university category number
Abertay (Dundee) 8
Aston 7
UWA Bangor 4
Birmingham 1
Bretton Hall (Wakefield) 9
Central Lancashire 5
Dundee 7
Imperial College (London) 3
Keele 4
Lancaster 4
Leeds 1
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine 7
Manchester Metropolitan University 2
Middlesex 2
Newcastle 3
UC Northampton 6
Northern College of Education (Aberdeen & Dundee) 9
Nottingham 1
Plymouth 2
Reading 4
College of Ripon & York St John 6
Royal College of Art (London) 8 - postgrads only
South Bank 5
Southampton Institute 5
York 3
|
Old university, Russell Group |
Old university, non-Russell |
New university |
College of HE upgrading |
|
|
Large > 18000
|
Birmingham Leeds 1 Nottingham |
Middlesex MMU 2 Plymouth |
||
|
Medium (>6000 <18000 students)
|
Imperial Coll. Newcastle York 3 |
Lancaster Reading Keele 4 Bangor |
Southampton Institute 5 South Bank Central Lancs |
Northampton Ripon 6 |
|
Small (<6000 students)
|
LSHTM Aston 7 Dundee |
RCA Abertay 8 |
Bretton Hall Northern Coll. of Education 9 |
JUSTEIS sample by subject discipline
Pure & Applied Science
|
Aston 7 |
Psychology & Human Biology |
|
Birmingham 1 |
School of Physics & Astronomy |
|
Imperial 3 |
Chemistry |
|
Keele 4 |
School of Chemistry & Physics |
|
Lancaster 4 |
Psychology |
|
Newcastle 3 |
School of Biochemistry & Genetics |
|
Plymouth 2 |
Dept. of Geological Sciences |
|
Ripon 6 |
Social, Environmental, Health & Life Sciences |
|
South Bank 5 |
School of Applied Science |
|
York 3 |
Physics |
Maths & Engineering
|
Aston 7 |
Chemical Engineering & Applied Chemistry |
|
Bangor 4 |
Mathematics |
|
Central Lancs 5 |
Centre for Materials Science (research only) |
|
Imperial 3 |
Aeronautics |
|
Leeds 1 |
Civil Engineering |
|
MMU 2 |
Electrical & Electronic Engineering |
|
Northern College of Education 9 |
Mathematics |
|
Nottingham 1 |
School of Mechanical etc |
|
Plymouth 2 |
School of Computing |
|
Southampton Institute 5 |
Maritime |
Pure & Applied Social Science
|
Abertay 8 |
Law |
|
Bretton Hall 9 |
Faculty of Education & Social Studies |
|
Central Lancs 5 |
International Business & Accounting |
|
Imperial 3 |
Management School |
|
Keele 4 |
School of Politics etc. |
|
Lancaster 4 |
Law |
|
Northampton 6 |
School of Behavioural Studies |
|
Nottingham 1 |
School of Education |
|
Plymouth 2 |
Social Policy & Social Work |
|
Southampton Institute 5 |
Business School |
Humanities & Arts
|
Aston 7 |
Languages & European Studies |
|
Leeds 1 |
Philosophy |
|
Middlesex 2 |
Arts, Design & Performing Arts |
|
Newcastle 3 |
Religious Studies |
|
Northern College of Education 9 |
Language |
|
Plymouth 2 |
Faculty of Arts & Education |
|
Reading 4 |
Classics |
|
Ripon 6 |
Humanities |
|
Royal College of Art 8 |
|
|
South Bank 5 |
Division of English |
|
York 3 |
Language & Linguistic Science |
Clinical Medicine
|
Aston 7 |
Life & Health Sciences |
|
Dundee 7 |
Medical School |
|
Imperial 3 |
Biomedical Science |
|
Keele 4 |
Obstetrics & Gynaecology |
|
Leeds 1 |
Medicine |
|
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine 7 |
Public Health & Policy |
|
Northampton 6 |
Nene Centre for Healthcare Education |
|
Nottingham 1 |
School of Human Development |
|
Plymouth 2 |
Institute of Health Studies |
|
York 3 |
Health Science & Clinical Evaluation |
JUSTEIS sample by institution
X = no departments within this discipline. "Departments" taken at level given in listings on HEI web pages; descriptions include Faculty, School, Division, Department, Centre
|
Pure & Applied Science |
Maths & Engineering |
Pure & Applied Social Science |
Humanities & Arts |
Clinical Medicine |
|
|
Abertay (Dundee) 8 |
Law |
||||
|
Aston 7 |
Psychology & Human Biology
|
Chemical Engineering & Applied Chemistry |
Languages & European Studies |
Life & Health Sciences |
|
|
UWA Bangor 4 |
Mathematics |
||||
|
Birmingham 1 |
School of Physics & Astronomy |
||||
|
Bretton Hall (Wakefield) 9 |
X |
X |
Faculty of Education & Social Studies |
X |
|
|
Centre for Materials Science |
International Business & Accounting |
||||
|
Dundee 7 |
Medical School |
||||
|
Imperial College 3 (London) |
Chemistry |
Aeronautics |
Management School |
Biomed. Sciences |
|
|
Keele 4 |
School of Physics & Chemistry |
School of Politics etc |
Obstetrics & Gynaecol. |
||
|
Lancaster 4 |
Psychology |
Law |
X |
||
|
Leeds 1 |
Civil Engineering |
Philosophy |
Medicine |
||
|
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine 7 |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Public Health & Policy |
|
Middlesex 2 |
Art, Design & Performing Arts |
X |
|||
|
Manchester Metropolitan University |
Electrical & Electronic Engineering |
X |
|||
|
Newcastle 3 |
School of Biochemistry & Genetics |
Religious Studies |
|||
|
UC Northampton 6 |
School of Behavioural Studies |
Nene Centre for H'lthcare Education |
|
Northern College of Education (Aberdeen & Dundee) 9 |
Mathematics |
Language |
X |
||
|
Nottingham 1 |
School of Mechanical etc |
School of Education |
School of Human Dev'ment. |
||
|
Plymouth 2 |
Geological Sciences |
School of Computing |
Social Policy & Social Work |
Faculty of Arts & Education |
Institute of Health Studies |
|
Reading 4 |
Classics |
X |
|||
|
College of Ripon & York St John 6 |
Social, Environment Health & Life Sciences |
Humanities |
X |
||
|
Royal College of Art (London) 8 |
X |
X |
X |
any |
X |
|
South Bank 5 |
Division of English |
||||
|
Southampton Institute 5 |
X |
Maritime |
Business School |
X |
|
|
York 3 |
Physics |
Language & Linguistic Sciences |
Health Sciences & Clinical Eval. |
ALB 1 Oct 1999
APPENDEX 5: FINAL LIST OF CONTRIBUTING HEIs (BOTH STRANDS)
Abertay (Dundee)
Aberystwyth (Pilot)
Anglia
Aston
Bath
Birmingham
Bolton
Bournemouth
Bradford
Bretton Hall (Wakefield)
Brighton
Bristol
Brunel
Buckinghamshire Chilterns
Canterbury
Central Lancashire
City
Coventry
Cranfield
De Montfort
Derby
Dundee
Durham
Glamorgan
Imperial College (London)
Institute of Child Health (London)
Keele
Lancaster
Leeds
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Manchester Metropolitan University
Middlesex
Newcastle
Newman College (Pilot)
UC Northampton
Northern College of Education (Aberdeen & Dundee)
Nottingham
Plymouth
Reading
College of Ripon & York St John
Rockefeller Medical Library
Royal College of Art (London)
South Bank
Southampton Institute
St Andrews (Pilot)
Swansea
Trinity Carmarthen
University of Wales Bangor
University of Wales College of Medicine
University College London
York
APPENDIX 6: FIRST E-MAIL SENT TO MAIN SURVEY DEPARTMENTS
Emails sent as follows:
To the Faculty Heads/Dept. HODs/Administrators
The Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) of the Higher Education Funding Councils has funded a major research project on the monitoring and evaluation of user behaviour in information seeking and use of information technology and information services in UK Higher Education (JISC Circular 1/99). A team at Aberystwyth has been selected to undertake two of the four strands in this JISC project.
The research work involves interviewing a sample of students and staff at HE institutions throughout the UK, ensuring that the sampling frame includes a range of types of departments, disciplines, staff (academic and academic-related) and students. The aim is to inform JISC about likely trends in usage of electronic information services of all varieties.
Your institution and department have been randomly selected for this exercise, and we hope that you will be able to co-operate with us. A further random sample of your staff and students would be selected and asked to take part in a short telephone or face-to-face interview.
To this end, we should be very grateful if you would provide us with a list of staff (academic and academic-related) in your department, and also a list of students (or student IDs), including postgraduate (taught and research), undergraduate (1st, 2nd & final years - full-time, part-time and distance learning).
We will be contacting you shortly by phone to discuss this proposal further.
If you have any immediate questions please contact:
Christine Urquhart , email cju@aber.ac.uk tel. 01970-622162 fax 01970-622190, DIS, Dept. Information Studies, University of Wales Aberystwyth, Aberystwyth, SY23 3AS
APPENDIX 7: INITIAL E-MAIL TO LIBRARIANS OF PARTICIPATING INSTITUTIONS
Dated end October/early November 1999
The Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) of the Higher Education Funding Councils has funded a major research project on the monitoring and evaluation of user behaviour in information seeking and use of information technology and information services in UK Higher Education (JISC Circular 1/99). A team at Aberystwyth has been selected to undertake two of the four strands in this JISC project.
The research work involves interviewing a sample of students and staff at HE institutions throughout the UK, ensuring that the sampling frame includes a range of types of departments, disciplines, staff (academic and academic-related) and students. The aim is to inform JISC about likely trends in usage of electronic information services of all varieties.
Your institution has been randomly selected for this exercise, and some departments have been approached to include in the sample. This is merely to inform you [as librarian] of the situation and ask if you would be prepared to answer some questions in the future, if requested?
We will be contacting you shortly by phone to discuss this proposal further.
If you have any immediate questions please contact:
Christine Urquhart
email cju@aber.ac.uk
tel. 01970-622162
fax 01970-622190
APPENDIX 8: EXCEPTION PLAN ADVISORY LETTERS
Dear
Thank you for agreeing to see us tomorrow (9th May). We will find our way to the Staff Common Room (hopefully) for 12.30pm.
I hope this information will make it a little clearer what the project is hoping to achieve and how you can help us - Our project is a JISC-commissioned study of the use of electronic information resources in UK higher education institutions, and we are trying to cover the whole spectrum of academic disciplines across the institutions studied (3 in Wales). We hope that you will be able to facilitate access to students in your department for the distribution of questionnaires, and also to 'round-up' 5 students for personal interviews. We are looking at two possible methods of distribution for the questionnaires - either via e-mail (if students' e-mail addresses are available) or by paper copies, but whichever method is used, we would appreciate your support in encouraging the students to respond. We will be happy to tell you more when we meet you, but if you want any further information, the web site for the project is http://www.dil.aber.ac.uk/DIS/Research/Justeis/JISCTop.htm
Thanks, see you tomorrow.
**************************************************************
Dear
Thanks for talking with me over the phone this morning. Just to recap, what we are asking of you is to find us 1 "electronic information-friendly" lecturer each from 3 departments (preferably History, Education and Sports Studies, but anywhere else, if those don't work out), who would be willing to cooperate in our JISC-commissioned study of the use of electronic information resources in UK HEIs. (We are actually looking for 2 departments per institution, but are going for 3 now, to have one spare.) We are not going for similar departments at each institution, but across the 3 institutions in the sample we hope to cover the whole spectrum of academic disciplines.
The Web site for the project is at URL http://www.dil.aber.ac.uk/DIS/Research/Justeis/JISCTop.htm
We will be asking the lecturers to facilitate access to students in their departments.
This will entail a couple of meetings with project staff, distributing questionnaires to students (and encouraging them to respond), and also rounding up about 5 of them for personal interviews. In addition to the 5 personal student interviews, we will be distributing about 1,000 e-mail questionnaires (spread across the 6 departments in 3 institutions, not 1,000 per institution!), and we might need help from them in gathering e-mail addresses or otherwise distributing the questionnaires. The extent of their involvement in distributing the e-mail questionnaires depends largely on how accessible student e-mail addresses are to us. We've found that some institutions will quite happily supply us with a photocopied list of student names and e-mail addresses (or even have them posted on the WWW); others will do mass e-mailing for us, but can't give out the addresses; others are unwilling or unable to help at all because of the way their institution or department treats the privacy legislation. On that score, are you able to tell me what the Trinity policy is on giving out student e-mail addresses?
Thank you very much for your cooperation.
Yours sincerely,
APPENDIX 9: E-MAIL TO ENLIST STAFF AND STUDENT VOLUNTEERS
RE: JUSTEIS (JISC Usage Surveys: Trends in Electronic Information Services)
The Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) of the Higher Education Funding Councils has funded a major research project on the monitoring and evaluation of user behaviour in information seeking and use of information technology and information services in UK Higher Education (JISC Circular 1/99). A team at Aberystwyth has been selected to undertake two of the four strands in this JISC project.
The research work involves interviewing a sample of students and staff at HE institutions throughout the UK, ensuring that the sampling frame includes a range of types of departments, disciplines, staff (academic and academic-related) and students. The aim is to inform JISC about likely trends in usage of electronic information services of all varieties.
Your institution and department have been randomly selected for this exercise, and we hope that you will be able to co-operate with us. We would like you to attend a short face-to-face interview during the week (date supplied) at a venue to be decided. [NB version for staff replaces previous sentence with: We would like you to take part in a telephone interview during the week (date supplied)]. Those people agreeing to be interviewed will be entered for a small prize draw at the end of the exercise. Interviews will be no longer than 20 minutes and all information will be treated strictly confidentially - no institution, department or individual will be identified in the results as JISC are only concerned with overall trends of system use.
If you would be interested in taking part in this exercise please contact, as soon as possible:
Christine Urquhart
email: cju@aber.ac.uk
tel: 01970 622162
fax: 01970 622190
Department of Information & Library Studies
University of Wales
Llanbadarn Fawr
Aberystwyth
Ceredigion
SY23 3AS
APPENDIX 10: SURVEY INSTRUMENT (STRAND A)
3 Dec. 1999
Note: Explanatory information will be emailed to participants prior to interview
Project authority
This research project is being conducted on behalf of the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) of the Higher Education Funding Councils, and your department has given us permission to survey a small sample of staff and students.
Purpose of project
We are surveying patterns of use of electronic information services by students, academics and librarians across all sectors and disciplines within Higher Education in the UK, in order to inform JISC about likely trends in the use of electronic information services of all varieties.
Why you have been chosen
A sample of different types of university and, within them, departments representing various academic disciplines, has been chosen at random. Within your department you have also been chosen at random for interview.
Anonymity
All the information you give us will be treated confidentially; no individuals, departments or universities will be identified in our results and we will report only overall trends and statistics.
Welcome and introductions.
Check that interviewee has read the above (email).
Any questions?
Explain recording method(s)
Q1 Check that basic details are correct
|
ALL USERS |
||||||
|
Institution |
||||||
|
Department/School |
||||||
|
Sex |
Male |
Female |
||||
|
Age |
under 20 |
20-29 |
30-39 |
40-49 |
50-59 |
60 & over |
|
First language (if not English) or country of education (if not UK) |
||||||
|
Special needs? |
Dyslexia; blind or partially sighted; deaf or hearing impairment; wheelchair user or mobility difficulties; personal care support; mental health difficulties; an unseen disability e.g. diabetes, epilepsy or asthma; multiple disabilities; other disability |
|||||
|
Access to networked computers |
At work? |
At home? University network or own ISP?
|
||||
|
STUDENTS |
||||||
|
Student |
Full-time |
Part-time |
Distance learning |
|||
|
Where live? |
On campus |
Off campus |
||||
|
Undergraduate |
Year |
|||||
|
Postgraduate |
Taught/Research |
|||||
|
Degree subject |
||||||
|
STAFF |
||||||
|
Type |
Teaching staff |
Research staff |
||||
|
Full-time |
Part-time |
|||||
|
Main teaching & research areas |
||||||
|
LIBRARY STAFF AS USER |
||||||
|
Professional specialism |
||||||
|
Subject area(s) |
||||||
We're using two approaches to gather information. For the first, we'd like you to think back over the last week or so...
Q2 Can you think back to an occasion during the last week or so when you needed to find information that you personally didn't have, and which involved your using a computer?
Prompts:
Q3 We now need as much detail as you can remember about what you did, please
Prompts:
Were you aware of using more than one source, moving from one to another? e.g. clicked on link from bib. reference to go to full text of article, from website to website, from search engine results to website
Q4 Why did you need this information? What were you trying to achieve?
Purpose/Reasons for use
NB Make notes then categorise later but use as prompts if necessary
(based on Saracevic & Kantor taxonomy) NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE
|
research - personal research - funded dissertation or thesis project work paper, report, article (writing or starting) bibliography, references, citations (compiling, checking) assignment for course or degree exam or test revision teaching (preparation, gathering material) presentation proposal for research funding job search, application, interview preparation planning some activity or work administration e.g. student records online shopping delegated work (doing it for someone else) |
|
to learn or confirm something keeping up-to-date or catching up with topic |
|
pleasure, leisure, recreation, curiosity to reduce stress or worry |
|
using instead of other choices (sources, people) |
|
get a book etc from library using document delivery reserving item |
|
other - please specify |
Q5 Did you find the information you wanted or are you still looking?
(effectiveness of search; degree of satisfaction with results)
Prompts:
Q6 Was this an unusual search for you? What type searches of electronic information sources do you usually do and how often?
Thank you. Now we'd like to use a slightly different approach, by looking at factors which affect what you are currently trying to achieve on professional, academic and personal fronts.
Q7 What are your current objectives? What do you need to accomplish in the near future?
e.g. professional, academic, personal; this term/semester/academic year
marking, completing coursework, securing finance, buying goods, booking holiday, research funding, writing papers, contacting friends, etc?
Q8 What sort of stuff do you need to get there?
identify a limited number of areas in which satisfactory results will ensure success; vital factors only, core issues
Q9 What information do you need to help you achieve your objectives?
relate to factors, emphasis on electronic information
Q10 What electronic information sources are important to you and your work? What can't you do without?
do you need to access other electronic information which is not presently available to you?
are there other sources which you have heard about and intend to look at/use sometime?
what electronic information services/sources do you regularly use?
Use prompts from short list as necessary (see below)
Thank you very much for your time. The results of our research will be published ...
EIS checklist
|
always get as much detail as possible |
|
|
|
discussion list, news group professional/academic use personal use |
|
own HEI website or services |
student records timetables local information lecture notes courseware |
|
library catalogues |
own HEI OPAC other HEIs COPAC BL other |
|
electronic journals |
single journal ) CD-ROM or web collection ) publisher pre-prints document delivery |
|
Internet/WWW |
search engine(s) - which one(s) bibliographic (explain) databases - which service, which database(s) gateways other sites |
|
CD-ROM |
networked stand alone |
|
statistical/numeric datasets, text archives |
local other |
|
electronic collection management system (LIS staff only) |
Interviewer's checklist
|
Question |
Tick |
|
|
Q3 |
EIS service and sources used |
|
|
Why choose this source? |
||
|
Alternative sources? |
||
|
Location of computer workstation used |
||
|
Asked others for help? |
||
|
Urgent or on-going search? |
||
|
When start / complete search? |
||
|
How much time spent? |
||
|
Awareness of moving from one source to another |
||
|
Q4 |
Why needed information? |
|
|
What trying to achieve? |
||
|
What did with information? |
||
|
Use information again later? |
||
|
Q5 |
Found what wanted or still looking? |
|
|
Effectiveness of search, satisfaction with results |
||
|
Any problems? |
||
|
Q6 |
Unusual search? |
|
|
What types of search and how often? |
||
|
Q7 |
Objectives? |
|
|
Q8 |
Stuff needed to get there? |
|
|
Q9 |
Information needed to help achieve objectives? |
|
|
Q10 |
Important EIS, can't do without? |
|
|
Access to others not currently available? |
||
|
Intend to use others? |
||
|
EIS used regularly (prompts) |
APPENDIX 11: E-MAIL AND POSTAL SURVEY INSTRUMENT (STRAND A)
Various versions of this questionnaire were used, with different opening instructions and some variations to the questions. The variant sections are italicised. The format displayed here is not necessarily that used in the email or postal survey instrument.
(Dear [name]
Thank you very much for replying. Perhaps you would be good enough to fill in the questionnaire below and return it to me. tWould you please think about a particular information seeking tincident and describe it in detail and then fill in the answers taccordingly.) (variation for academic staff volunteers)
Questionnaire on Your Use of Electronic Information Services by the Joint Information Systems Committee of the Higher Education Funding Councils
The JUSTEIS Project
Many of you will remember that in January this project was trying to organise interviews with you and the other students who are now receiving this questionnaire. If you were interviewed, please read no further and do not fill in a questionnaire. If we failed to agree a time or to meet you for some reason, please _DO_ fill in this questionnaire and send it back to cju@aber.ac.uk.
(variation : in the freepost envelope provided – some other local arrangements were made in some institutions for central collection of these)
If you reply with a complete questionnaire you will be entered in the music token prize draw automatically.
The project is surveying patterns of use of electronic information services by students, academics and librarians across all sectors and disciplines within Higher Education in the UK. It is important to gather this information so that appropriate services can continue to be supplied to you. The questionnaire will only take a few minutes. So PLEASE DO FILL IT IN and RETURN IT! (variation in font used for last sentence to embolden some text instructions for postal questionnaires)
Firstly, please think back to an occasion during the last week or so when you needed to find information that you personally did not have, and which involved you using a computer. (The need may have been personal or academic, as simple as you like, and may have required the use of anything from the Internet to CD-ROMs, databases, e-mail, online texts, etc.) (variation for postal questionnaires: paragraph in bold text)
Now please answer the following questions (place an "X" between the "[ ]" or type an answer):
(Pre-question: Please describe the incident in detail in this space: i.e. what you were looking for, why you chose the source/service you used, was there an alternative you could have used, how long it took, did you need help, where the search took place....) (Variation inserted in later instruments to encourage respondents to think of one occasion in particular)
1. Was the information search for:
assignment for course [ ]
background reading/research [ ]
preparation for project or
field work [ ]
dissertation or thesis [ ]
a paper or report [ ]
bibliography, reference
checking [ ]
exam or test revision [ ]
seminar or class presentation [ ]
proposal for research
or project [ ]
job search or application [ ]
planning some activity [ ]
online shopping [ ]
someone else - you did the
search for them [ ]
2. What resources did you use?
Please give as many details as you can about the electronic sources you used. These may have been email, CD-ROM, the library catalogue, the Internet (and which search engine, for example?) or other databases.
3. What led you to this resource?
Lecturer/tutor suggestion [ ]
Another student [ ]
Read about it [ ]
Library induction/course [ ]
Library staff advice [ ]
Other [ ]
4. Did you find the information you wanted?
yes [ ]
or no [ ]
or some [ ]
5. Was this a normal or usual kind of search for you?
yes [ ]
or no [ ]
6. Please list other kinds of electronic information resources which you use from time to time - have you any favourites?
Finally please let us know:
7. Are you male [ ]
female [ ]
8. Are you under 20 [ ]
20-29 [ ]
30-39 [ ]
40-49 [ ]
50-59 [ ]
60 and over [ ]
9. What is your department?
10. What is your first language?
11. Do you have any special needs? (e.g dyslexia or hearing difficulties) yes [ ]
no [ ]
12. Do you have access to a networked computer in the department?
yes [ ]
no [ ]
Do you have access to a networked computer from your term-time address?
yes [ ]
no [ ]
If yes, is this a university connection [ ]
Or your own Internet service provider [ ]
13. Are you
full-time [ ]
or part-time [ ]
or a distance learner [ ]
14. Do you live: on campus [ ]
off campus [ ]
15. Are you post-graduate [ ]
Is this a taught course [ ]
or by research [ ]
16. Are you undergraduate [ ]
What year:
1 [ ] or 2 [ ] or 3 [ ] or 4 [ ] or 5 [ ]
17. What is your degree subject?
(What is your subject area?) (Variation used for staff)
Many thanks for your time. No information you have included will be linked with you or to the institution.
Good luck with your course.
You will be entered for the prize draw for a music voucher.
PLEASE RETURN TO: cju@aber.ac.uk
Christine Urquhart
DIS, Dept. Information Studies
University of Wales Aberystwyth
Aberystwyth
SY23 3AS
UK
tel. 01970-622162
fax 01970-622190, email cju@aber.ac.uk
APPENDIX 12: SURVEY INSTRUMENT (STRAND C: PURCHASING INTENTIONS)
(Set out in sets of questions – dealing with perceptions of services to users, then dealing with some of the management and budgeting issues, then moving on to evaluation and ‘futures’ issues)
One route for reducing journal subscription costs might be for authors to pay for submission (page costs). How might this affect your institution?
APPENDIX 13 - SURVEY INSTRUMENT (STRAND C: WEB SITE SURVEY)
|
HEI |
Date: |
||||||
|
Time spent: |
|||||||
|
JISC/CHEST |
|||||||
|
Other online |
|||||||
|
Web Database |
|||||||
|
Data sets |
|||||||
|
Text archives |
|||||||
|
Gateway/RDN |
|||||||
|
Own OPACs |
|||||||
|
Other OPACs |
|||||||
|
Other Web sites |
|||||||
|
Current Awareness/ SDI |
|||||||
|
IAS/DocDel |
|||||||
|
E-jnl collections |
|||||||
|
Single e-jnls |
|||||||
|
Individual publishers |
|||||||
|
Pre-prints |
|||||||
|
Local EIS |
|||||||
|
Search Engines |
|||||||
|
e-Colln Mngmnt |
|||||||
|
Other Web EIS |
|||||||
APPENDIX 14 NUD*IST HIERARCHY OF CATEGORIES
Q.S.R. NUD*IST Power version, revision 4.0.
Licensee: Justeis Project.
(D) //Document Annotations
(F) //Free Nodes
(F 1) //Free Nodes/Lack of Confidence
(F 3) //Free Nodes/likes
(F 2) //Free Nodes/technophobia
(I) //Index Searches
(I 1) //Index Searches/1st yr UGs and preferences
(I 11) //Index Searches/3rd years & lack of awareness
(I 6) //Index Searches/Age & Attitudes Matrix Node.
(I 5) //Index Searches/gender & attitude Matrix Node.
(I 9) //Index Searches/Gender & Tutor pointer Matrix Node.
(I 7) //Index Searches/Institution and problems Matrix Node.
(I 4) //Index Searches/PGs and Attitudes Matrix Node.
(I 2) //Index Searches/student gender Matrix Node.
(I 10) //Index Searches/UGs & attitudes Matrix Node.
(I 8) //Index Searches/UGs & Own ISPs Matrix Node.
(I 3) //Index Searches/undergraduate & staff pointer Matrix Node.
(T) //Text Searches
(T 1) //Text Searches/Access
(T 2) //Text Searches/Hotmail
(T 7) //Text Searches/opac
(T 3) //Text Searches/our web page
(C) //Node Clipboard - 'TextSearch195'
(4) /Attitudes
(4 4) /Attitudes/Behaviour change
(4 8) /Attitudes/Being cool
(4 9) /Attitudes/formal vs informal
(4 7) /Attitudes/IT confidence
(4 3) /Attitudes/Learning and CPD
(4 2) /Attitudes/One-up-manship
(4 5) /Attitudes/Preferences
(4 1) /Attitudes/Time spent
(4 1 1) /Attitudes/Time spent/intermittent
(4 10) /Attitudes/visibility of eis
(4 6) /Attitudes/wish lists
(1) /Base Data
(1 2) /Base Data/Age
(1 2 2) /Base Data/Age/20-29
(1 2 3) /Base Data/Age/30-39
(1 2 4) /Base Data/Age/40-49
(1 2 5) /Base Data/Age/50-59
(1 2 6) /Base Data/Age/60 and over
(1 2 1) /Base Data/Age/under 20
(1 1) /Base Data/Gender
(1 1 1) /Base Data/Gender/Female
(1 1 2) /Base Data/Gender/Male
(1 9) /Base Data/Institution Type
(1 9 2) /Base Data/Institution Type/Large, New
(1 9 1) /Base Data/Institution Type/Large, Old, Russell
(1 9 6) /Base Data/Institution Type/Medium, College HE
(1 9 5) /Base Data/Institution Type/Medium, New
(1 9 4) /Base Data/Institution Type/Medium, Old, Non-Russell
(1 9 3) /Base Data/Institution Type/Medium, Old, Russell
(1 9 9) /Base Data/Institution Type/Small, College HE
(1 9 8) /Base Data/Institution Type/Small, New
(1 9 7) /Base Data/Institution Type/Small, Old, Non-Russell
(1 3) /Base Data/Language
(1 3 1) /Base Data/Language/English
(1 3 2) /Base Data/Language/Other
(1 7) /Base Data/Lives
(1 7 2) /Base Data/Lives/Off Campus
(1 7 1) /Base Data/Lives/On Campus
(1 5) /Base Data/Network Access
(1 5 2) /Base Data/Network Access/At Home
(1 5 2 2) /Base Data/Network Access/At Home/Own ISP
(1 5 2 1) /Base Data/Network Access/At Home/University Network
(1 5 1) /Base Data/Network Access/At work
(1 4) /Base Data/Special Needs
(1 4 4) /Base Data/Special Needs/Deaf
(1 4 2) /Base Data/Special Needs/Dyslexia
(1 4 3) /Base Data/Special Needs/Immobility
(1 4 1) /Base Data/Special Needs/None
(1 4 5) /Base Data/Special Needs/Other
(1 8) /Base Data/Staff
(1 8 3) /Base Data/Staff/Both
(1 8 6) /Base Data/Staff/Full-time
(1 8 4) /Base Data/Staff/LIS
(1 8 7) /Base Data/Staff/Part-Time
(1 8 2) /Base Data/Staff/Research
(1 8 5) /Base Data/Staff/Subject Area
(1 8 5 1) /Base Data/Staff/Subject Area/Clinical Medicine
(1 8 5 2) /Base Data/Staff/Subject Area/Humanities, Arts
(1 8 5 3) /Base Data/Staff/Subject Area/Maths, Engineering
(1 8 5 4) /Base Data/Staff/Subject Area/Pure and Applied Sciences
(1 8 5 5) /Base Data/Staff/Subject Area/Pure and Applied Social Sciences
(1 8 1) /Base Data/Staff/Teaching
(1 6) /Base Data/Student
(1 6 6) /Base Data/Student/Degree Subject
(1 6 6 1) /Base Data/Student/Degree Subject/Clinical medicine
(1 6 6 2) /Base Data/Student/Degree Subject/Humanities, Arts
(1 6 6 3) /Base Data/Student/Degree Subject/Maths, Engineering
(1 6 6 4) /Base Data/Student/Degree Subject/Pure and Applied Sciences
(1 6 6 5) /Base Data/Student/Degree Subject/Pure and Applied Social Sciences
(1 6 5) /Base Data/Student/Distance learning
(1 6 3) /Base Data/Student/Full-Time
(1 6 4) /Base Data/Student/Part-Time
(1 6 2) /Base Data/Student/Postgraduate
(1 6 2 2) /Base Data/Student/Postgraduate/PhD
(1 6 2 1) /Base Data/Student/Postgraduate/Taught Masters
(1 6 1) /Base Data/Student/Undergraduate
(1 6 1 1) /Base Data/Student/Undergraduate/1st year
(1 6 1 2) /Base Data/Student/Undergraduate/2nd year
(1 6 1 3) /Base Data/Student/Undergraduate/3rd year
(1 6 1 4) /Base Data/Student/Undergraduate/4th year
(8) /Benefits of EIS
(8 6) /Benefits of EIS/add-ons
(8 4) /Benefits of EIS/desktop access
(8 5) /Benefits of EIS/ease of searching
(8 7) /Benefits of EIS/freebies
(8 3) /Benefits of EIS/multiple use
(8 1) /Benefits of EIS/offcampus access
(8 2) /Benefits of EIS/security (preservation)
(7) /Liaison
(7 8) /Liaison/converging services
(7 2) /Liaison/Dept-LIS
(7 6) /Liaison/lis pointer
(7 5) /Liaison/lis training
(7 1) /Liaison/lis training evaluation
(7 10) /Liaison/lis-lis agreements
(7 7) /Liaison/new service, support
(7 4) /Liaison/student pointer
(7 9) /Liaison/teaching and learning
(7 3) /Liaison/tutor pointer
(7 3 1) /Liaison/tutor pointer/tutor devised web site
(9) /LIS planning
(9 12) /LIS planning/access negotiations
(9 12 1) /LIS planning/access negotiations/publishers' deals
(9 12 1 1) /LIS planning/access negotiations/publishers' deals/bundling
(9 12 8) /LIS planning/access negotiations/subject based deals
(9 6) /LIS planning/budgeting
(9 14) /LIS planning/charging
(9 14 1) /LIS planning/charging/income
(9 7) /LIS planning/collection development evaluation
(9 11) /LIS planning/copyright
(9 9) /LIS planning/eis performance evaluation
(9 9 2) /LIS planning/eis performance evaluation/staff feedback
(9 9 1) /LIS planning/eis performance evaluation/student surveys
(9 9 3) /LIS planning/eis performance evaluation/usage data
(9 2) /LIS planning/government policies
(9 2 1) /LIS planning/government policies/space needs
(9 13) /LIS planning/HEI restructuring
(9 1) /LIS planning/hybrid libraries
(9 10) /LIS planning/journal subscriptions
(9 10 2) /LIS planning/journal subscriptions/print journal cancellation
(9 5) /LIS planning/licensing
(9 5 2) /LIS planning/licensing/password access
(9 5 1) /LIS planning/licensing/walk-in access
(9 15) /LIS planning/scholarly communication
(9 15 12) /LIS planning/scholarly communication/direct web archiving
(9 8) /LIS planning/SLAs
(9 4) /LIS planning/staffing
(9 4 2) /LIS planning/staffing/downsizing
(9 4 1) /LIS planning/staffing/staffing structure
(9 3) /LIS planning/uncertainties
(10) /Lis web site
(10 1) /Lis web site/development strategy
(6) /Miscellaneous Use
(6 2) /Miscellaneous Use/bookmarks
(6 6) /Miscellaneous Use/downloading references
(6 9) /Miscellaneous Use/home use
(6 8) /Miscellaneous Use/isp home
(6 5) /Miscellaneous Use/Local holdings
(6 4) /Miscellaneous Use/Making contact
(6 1) /Miscellaneous Use/printing
(6 1 1) /Miscellaneous Use/printing/photocopying
(6 3) /Miscellaneous Use/search strategies
(6 7) /Miscellaneous Use/videoconferencing
(11) /Other Access
(11 3) /Other Access/Expectations
(11 2) /Other Access/Staff wants
(11 1) /Other Access/Student wants
(3) /Problems
(3 9) /Problems/casual or chaotic use
(3 6) /Problems/Cultural differences
(3 2) /Problems/email problems
(3 1) /Problems/IT facility problems
(3 4) /Problems/lack of awareness
(3 8) /Problems/language
(3 10) /Problems/page subs.
(3 5) /Problems/quality of information
(3 7) /Problems/special needs
(3 3) /Problems/web page navigation
(2) /Purpose
(2 1) /Purpose/Assignment
(2 2) /Purpose/Background research
(2 6) /Purpose/Bib check
(2 13) /Purpose/For someone else
(2 10) /Purpose/Job search
(2 15) /Purpose/Other
(2 15 1) /Purpose/Other/administration
(2 5) /Purpose/Paper
(2 11) /Purpose/Planning
(2 8) /Purpose/Presentation
(2 3) /Purpose/Project
(2 9) /Purpose/Proposal
(2 14) /Purpose/Recreational
(2 7) /Purpose/Revision
(2 12) /Purpose/Shopping
(2 4) /Purpose/Thesis
(5) /Usefulness
(5 10) /Usefulness/browsing
(5 11) /Usefulness/conference organisation
(5 4) /Usefulness/Curiosities
(5 3) /Usefulness/Examples
(5 3 1) /Usefulness/Examples/Tests
(5 5) /Usefulness/Information presentation
(5 2) /Usefulness/lifting 'ready made'
(5 1) /Usefulness/opinions,debate
(5 6) /Usefulness/Organisational policies
(5 9) /Usefulness/research evidence
(5 7) /Usefulness/Using other libraries
(5 8) /Usefulness/What's new
APPENDIX 15: MINUTES OF ADVISORY BOARD MEETINGS
JUSTEIS Project Advisory Board First Meeting
24 November 1999
Department of Information & Library Studies, UWA
Present: Ray Lonsdale (Chair), David Stoker (Minutes), Christine Urquhart, Lucy Tedd (UWA DIS), Chris Armstrong, Roger Fenton, (Information Automation), Anne Barker, Rhian Thomas, (Project Researchers) Jennifer Rowley, David Harrison (JISC) Sandra Morris (UWA Information Services), Michael Keen (External adviser)
Apologies: Linda Banwell (University of Northumbria)
1. Project progress to date
David Stoker gave a brief progress report to date. - There had been a meeting with JISC Scientific Adviser on 13 September to agree definitions and methodologies. Since then a Project Board had been established with regular progress meetings, a Web site set up, press releases disseminated. Project research staff been appointed, and tasks allocated. The staff due to carry out the surveys have attended training courses for qualitative and quantitative data analysis. The date for the survey had been put back to January. Other items on the report were substantive agenda items.
2. Confirmation of the EIS Taxonomy & Definitions
The EIS taxonomy and definitions document was approved, and had been communicated to Northumbria, but no response had been received. It was pointed out that this was not a true taxonomy, but a list of categories with definitions and examples for use when conducting interviews. It had only been found necessary to use it on one occasion during the pilots. LAT suggested that it could form the basis of a useful publication.
3. Literature Review
The literature review had been compiled using LISA, BUBL, Current Cites and Alta Vista, and entries identified had been integrated with those found by the University of Northumbria. 285 items had identified, of which 185 were being examined in detail. The Review as 70% written up. Nothing significant had been found to date, most of the identified studies were insufficiently detailed to be useful to the project. However did confirm the need for such studies.
4. Confirmation of Sample
The sampling frame had already been circulated . Early indications were that several reminders would be required, and there were inevitable delays at some sites where different data protection registration arrangements. The intial plans had been to sample randomly the discipline cluster – but we may have to compromise on this and use a minimum number plus a percentage at each site. We have lists from around 9 sites already.
5. Confirmation of Survey Instruments
Version 8 of the instrument had been circulated to take account of earlier comments. Any further discussion would need to wait until the completion of the pilot survey.
6. Pilot Survey
Christine Urquhart, gave a verbal report of the preliminary results from the pilot survey. It started on 17 November involving 40-50 interviews, from University of Wales department of International Politics, Schools of Business and Management and institute of Biological Sciences (selected for reasons concerned with the nature of the student body, and convenience of location. A convenient room required for tape recording interviews, and entire interview takes around 10-15 minutes. Students had proved harder to enlist than staff.
The implications for the phase were:
From a sample of 12 interviews, the critical incident methodology appears to work well. Incidents mentioned included the checking of references, finding a paper, booking a flight, looking for a known article, using the OPAC for shelf references etc. etc. Interviewees were encouraged to talk about the incident. Can prompt for alternative sources that migh have been used and the ‘navigation used’.
The terminology used for the Critical Success Factors exercise could be a problem and new phrasing would have to be used for the survey. However, after prompting and reminders that email also consitutes an EIS, it does provide a better picture of overall needs and priorities and the ‘difference’ that EIS are likely to make to working practices. For the main phase we will need to ensure that we can match teaching/learning – to check whether academic staff are directing students towards EIS. Interviewees are sometimes vague about names of services, but it should be possible to use the taxonomy successfully in the analysis but some examples may be difficult to classify.
JR said that it was important for Strand A to seek to develop measures for future comparison, and not too delve too deeply – it should be looking at trends, rather than details.
7. Strand C Web Survey discussion of draft document -
Chris Armstrong produced version 1 of an outline document for recording the results of the Web survey. There was some discussion over exactly what should be counted in the survey. It was agreed that a preliminary investigation would be made of 25 web sites to identify the potential difficulties involved.
8. Publicity and dissemination issues
Press releases have been circulated to appropriate publications and a message about the project disseminated through various email lists. An entry for Current Research in LIS, had also been prepared.
The JUSTEIS web site was operational but after discussion with David Harrison, it was decided that should be transferred from the IAL site to the Department’s own Web server to accord with the normal practices of JISC projects.
9. A.O.B -
APPENDIX 16: TEAM MEETING DATES AND OUTLINE AGENDAS
Date: Outline Agenda
1st December 1999 1. Project web site
8th December 1999 1. Site chase-up for names
15th December 1999 1. Site chase-up for names
5th January 2000 1. Sites progress with staff/student lists and arrangements for room bookings
13th January 2000 1. Interim report
24th & 28th January 2000 1. Interim report
4th February 2000 1. Interim report
11th February 2000 1. Interim report
18th February 2000 1. Response to interim report
24th February 2000 1. Web site survey
7th March 2000 1. Web site survey
15th March 2000 (with JISC scientific adviser)
21st March 2000 1. Email from scientific adviser about student participation
28th March 2000 1. Pilot study/academic staff links
6th April 2000 1. JISC exception plan
26th April 2000 1. Exception plan
4th May 2000 1. Thank you letters/prizes
17th May 2000 1. Data analysis
30th May 2000 1. Exception plan work
7th June 2000 1. Report structure
5th July 2000 1. HEINUS news
APPENDIX 17: EXCEPTION PROJECT (SAMPLE)
Trinity College, Carmarthen (College of HE upgrading)
Initial Contact: Sally Wilkinson, Deputy Librarian: Systems
Diarmait Mac Giolla Chriost
Questionnaires – distributed and collected in lecture
6 student face-to-face interviews)
Ceredig W. Emanuel, Head of Sports Studies
Questionnaires – distributed and collected in lecture
6 student face-to-face interviews
University of Glamorgan (New university)
Initial contact: Wayne Morris, Database Manager, also teaches Internet Skills for the Staff Development Unit.
Questionnaires – distributed and collected in lecture
5 student face-to-face interviews
David Calderwood
Questionnaires – distributed and collected in lecture
5 student face-to-face interviews
Pru Marriott
Questionnaires only – distributed and collected in lecture
University of Wales Swansea (Old university non-Russell, medium)
Initial contact: Maureen Saunderson, Head, Training and Awareness, Libraries.
Steve Kennewell
Questionnaires – distributed in lecture and returned by students to a central collection point
5 student face-to-face interviews
Dr Bill Dowsland
Questionnaires – sent out and returned via e-mail (addresses provided by Dr Dowsland), by JISC project researcher, following endorsement by Department
5 student face-to-face interviews
Paul Meara
Questionnaires only – sent out and returned via e-mail. Sent by Dr Meara, and returned to JISC project researcher
This page last updated 25 August 2000 10:03:19
Research Pages maintained by Chris Armstrong